U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1956

Harry v. Newell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 2, 1956 · Chambers, Hamley, Stephens

237 F.2d 229 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Yergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant., Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. New-comb, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.