U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1958

Harold Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 19, 1958 · Barnes, Hamley, Goodman

260 F.2d 958 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Kimball & Clark, Ned W. Kimball, Waterville, Wash., for appellants., Dale M. Green, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Fraser, Asst. U. S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Havemeyer Textile v. Federal Insurance Administrator (District Court, E.D. New York 1983)
Dixie Warehouse v. Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 1982)
WILLIAMSBURGH DOLL & NOVELTY CORP. INC. v. Giuffrida (District Court, E.D. New York 1982)
Beacon Fruit & Produce Co., Inc. v. H. Harris & Co., Inc. (1st Cir. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee upon the ground that the record showed that appellants had failed to comply with the conditions precedent of crop insurance issued to them by appellee. The issue presented on the motion below and again on appeal here was whether or not the appel-lee had lawfully waived or was estopped to require compliance by appellants with the conditions precedent of the insurance contract.

Judge Sam Driver justly and properly disposed of the cause and we adopt his reasons as ours for affirming the judgment.

Affirmed on opinion below, Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, D.C.E.D.Wash.1958, 158 F.Supp. 688.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.