U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1958

Cavanaugh v. Long

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 24, 1958 · No. 15530

252 F.2d 959 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Grubic, Drendel & Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant., Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Franklin P. R. Rit-tenhouse, U. S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 555.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.