U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1961

Vito Bologna v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 14, 1961 · Barnes, Jertberg, Koelsch, Per Curiam

287 F.2d 559; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5110 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Murry Luftig, San Diego, Cal., for appellant., Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Thomas R. Sheridan, Chief U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Elmer Enstrom, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Richard Leigh Adams v. United States (9th Cir. 1962)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above appeal from a judgment of conviction coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

And the sole question on this appeal being whether Section 1407 of Title 18 U.S.C.A. is a narcotic law of the United States,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed, 181 F.Supp. 706, upon the opinion of Judge Jacob Weinberger, rendered on defendant’s previously made motion to dismiss.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.