U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1961

Mejia v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 19, 1961

301 F.2d 907 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William A. MacLaughlin, Los Angeles, Cal., and Gerald M. Doppelt, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner., Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Thomas R. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, and Edward M. Medvene, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Toney Campos Mejia v. United States (9th Cir. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Counsel who successfully prosecuted the appeal in Mejia v. United States, 9 Cir., 291 F.2d 198, has made application to this court for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus on behalf of said Mejia and has filed an affidavit in support of that application setting forth the reasons and grounds which it is proposed to be set forth in such a petition. Upon suggestion of this court the United States has filed a memorandum in opposition to the petitioner’s application.

The matter presented by the motion of the petitioner for leave to file such petition was set down for hearing and argued before the court by counsel for petitioner and by counsel on behalf of the United States Attorney representing the United States. Upon consideration of the application it is ordered that leave to file such petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.