We conclude that the order of the Federal. Maritime Commission had “ ‘warrant in the record’ and a reasonable basis-in law.” N. L. R. B. v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, 131, 64 S.Ct. 851, 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944). We do not consider it appropriate in the circumstances of' this case to consider the questions presented for the first time in the petition for review filed in this Court. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33, 36-37, 73 S.Ct. 67, 97 L.Ed.. 54 (1952).

The order is affirmed.