Appellant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the heroin which was received in evidence should have been excluded on the ground that it is a product of an illegal search and seizure. We hold to the contrary. See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.

The Judgment of conviction is affirmed.