U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1966

Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 26, 1966 · Browning, Merrill, Per Curiam, Thompson
361 F.2d 310; 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064; 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6380 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon an examination of the whole record we conclude that there was substantial evidence from which the Board could infer that the activities leading to the employee’s discharge were engaged in with or on behalf of other employees, and not solely by and on behalf of the discharged employee himself, and thus were “concerted activities for the purpose of * * mutual aid or protection” within the meaning of section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, protected by section 8 (a) (1) of the Act.

The order of the Board will be enforced.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.