U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1966

Schnitzer Steel Products Co. v. Amtro Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 21, 1966

368 F.2d 575; 1970 A.M.C. 258 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gunther F. Krause, Carl R. Neil, of Krause, Lindsay & Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for appellant-cross appellee Schnitzer Steel Products Co., Lofton L. Tatum, of Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser & Brooke, Portland, Or., for appellee Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda., Alex L. Parks, of Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks & Templeton, Portland, Or., Robert A. Fletcher, of Fletcher & Rauch, Los Angeles, Cal., for appelleecross-appellant Amtro Corp., S. A.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re United Equipment, Inc., Debtor. Concord Commercial Corporation v. U.S. National Bank of Oregon (9th Cir. 1994)
SUN REFINING & MARKETING v. Goldstein Oil Co. (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have before us appeals from a final decree in admiralty rendered in the court below. The trial judge stated his findings and conclusions in an opinion reported under the title Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda. v. S.S. Nictric, D.C., 247 F.Supp. 161.

This court is of the view that the opinion of the trial court correctly disposed of all issues in the case. Accordingly, the decree is affirmed for the reasons and on the grounds stated in the district court’s opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.