U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1967

Decevigne Kilpatrick v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 9, 1967 · Barnes, Jertberg, Muecke, Per Curiam

372 F.2d 93 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Franklin P. Jones, Fresno, Cal., for appellant., Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief Crim. Div., William J. Gargaro, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Don Wade v. United States (9th Cir. 1970)
Lanier Allison Ramer v. United States of America, Eugene Richard Church v. United States (9th Cir. 1968)
Bernard Henry Oliver, Jr. v. United States (9th Cir. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On the record before us, we decline to change the rule of this circuit, and affirm the judgment of the lower court on the basis of Sauer v. United States, 241 F.2d 640 (9th Cir. 1957), and Smith v. United States, 342 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1965).

We thank appointed counsel for the indigent defendant on an outstanding presentation of a difficult subject.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.