U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1967

Ronald M. Coleman v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 4, 1967 · Barnes, Jertberg, Per Curiam, Smith

378 F.2d 56; 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles A. Collier, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., John K. Van de Kamp, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief Crim. Div., Roger A. Browning, Michael D. Nasatir, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Richard William Francisco, United States of America v. Melvin Leroy Francisco (8th Cir. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 — the stealing and taking of goods from interstate commerce with the intent to convert them to his own use. The issues of asportation, intent and sufficiency of the evidence were for the jury. The value of the goods and the fact of interstate commerce were stipulated to.

The jury adopted the prosecution’s view of the evidence, and convicted appellant. We affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.