Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness, 389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968)
Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness
Opinion
Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.
Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.
We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mahala Ashley DICKERSON, Appellant, v. Richard GANTZ, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness, Appellees
- Status
- Published