Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1968

Thomas N. O'Hara v. People of State of California

Thomas N. O'Hara v. People of State of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 15, 1968
390 F.2d 878 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Thomas N. O'Hara v. People of State of California

Opinion

390 F.2d 878

Thomas N. O'HARA, Appellant,
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee.

No. 21682.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 15, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Sherrill Halbert, Judge.

Carl B. Shapiro (argued), San Anselmo, Cal., Vincent Hallinan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Nelson Kempsky (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appeal from the district court's dismissal of appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner's failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑