Stanley Francis Silva v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Stanley Francis Silva v. United States, 394 F.2d 3 (9th Cir. 1968)
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301

Stanley Francis Silva v. United States

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant’s in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda- type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).

Reference

Full Case Name
Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Status
Published