Stanley Francis Silva v. United States
Stanley Francis Silva v. United States
394 F.2d 3; 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Stanley Francis Silva v. United States
Opinion
The defendant’s in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda- type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.