Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness, 400 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1968)
Jertberg, Duniway, Foley

J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. 1 We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant. 2

Affirmed.

1

. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210.

2

. See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. Howard ARNOLD, Appellant, v. William J. McGUINESS, Appellee
Status
Published
↑