U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1969

Nina Raass v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 6, 1969 · Merrill, Browning, Duniway

404 F.2d 937 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Milton T. Simmons and Donald L. Un-gar, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, San Pedro, Calif., Ramsey Clark, Atty. Gen. of U. S., Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The identical issue here presented, upon substantially identical facts, was dealt with by this court in Bloomfield v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 404 F.2d 656 [Dec. 19, 1968],

Upon the authority of that opinion the order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service denying application for change of status is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.