U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1969

Heung Lee, AKA Sam Heung Lee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Heung Lee, AKA Sam Heung Lee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 14, 1969 · Hamley, Jertberg, Carter
406 F.2d 774 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joseph S. Hertogs (argued), of Jackson & Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., David R. Urdan, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, San Pedro, Cal., for appellee.

Heung Lee, AKA Sam Heung Lee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals of the United States Department of Justice, on review in this cause, is affirmed on the authority of 22282, Kwai Chiu Yuen v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 406 F.2d 499.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.