U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1969

United States of America, and v. George Lee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 9, 1969 · Chambers, Koelsch, Per Curiam, Solomon

411 F.2d 1017 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John Hansler (argued), of Comfort, Dolack, Hansler & Billett, Tacoma, Wash., for appellant., J. S. Obenour (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Eugene G. Cushing, U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Harper v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

DECISION.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We find the objection to the information not well taken. Likewise, we find the objection based upon Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, insubstantial. At the critical time Lee was not in custody and there was no restraint or threat to take him into custody. Further, we find on the record here no error in the receiving of evidence or in the instructions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.