U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1969

United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo

United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 4, 1969 · Hamley, Duniway, Byrne
411 F.2d 1057 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Roger M. Hughes, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The opinion heretofore filed in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place:

Appellant was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He drove a car across the border from Mexico into the United States. There were 110 bricks of marihuana concealed in the car. Appellant claimed that he did not know that the marihuana was there, and on appeal argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that he did know. We hold that the evidence is sufficient. Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 256, 259; Aguilar v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 379.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.