U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States v. William Howard Boyer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1970 · Barnes, Ely, Huf-Stedler, Per Curiam

421 F.2d 842; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11081 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Michael M. Moore (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant., William Smitherman (argued), Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Attys., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

Commonwealth v. Stanley (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979)
United States v. Fisher (9th Cir. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant urges on appeal, after conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (interstate transportation of a firearm by a convicted felon), that (a) there was no sufficient proof of his prior felony conviction, and (b) that the recital of a concurrent sentence for criminal contempt of court in the certified copy of the judgment and sentence (introduced as Ex. 6) for conviction of first degree robbery with use of a deadly weapon was improper proof of another crime.

There was no objection made by defense counsel to Exhibit 6, either when it was offered in evidence (Tr. p. 45), or when it was read to the jury. (Tr. p. *843 61.) Without reference to other supporting evidence from testimony of witnesses, no error occurred. Paster-chik v. United States, 400 F.2d 696 (9th Cir. 1968).

The conviction is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.