U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States v. Richard Field Pieters

United States v. Richard Field Pieters
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1970 · Chambers, Ely, Per Curiam, Trask
423 F.2d 1200 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. B. Tietz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Gregory E. Fischbach (argued), Michael J. Lightfoot, Asst. U. S. Attys., Wm. Matthew Byrne, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

United States v. Richard Field Pieters

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

This is a selective service case in which defendant-appellant for the first time gave notice of asserted conscientious objections at the induction center when he refused to be inducted. On the record, there is no prior official notice of such a claim.

The case is governed by Brown v. United States, 9 Cir., 409 F.2d 1354, and Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.