Jack Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jack Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 424 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1970)
19 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 587; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9555

Jack Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Martinez and others are plaintiffs below and appeal from a judgment dismissing their action on the ground that there is no liability. The district judge, the *548 Honorable Ray McNichols, wrote a careful and detailed opinion in the case which is reported at 283 F.Supp. 514 (1968). As to count one of the complaint, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district judge at 283 F.Supp. pp. 523-533. As to count two of the complaint, we affirm for the reason stated by the district judge under the heading “Issue of Law No. 10 states: ” at 283 F.Supp. pp. 521-523. We express no opinion as to the correctness of his decision under issues 8 and 9, discussed at 283 F.Supp. pp. 518-521.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jack MARTINEZ Et Al., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published