U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States of America, and v. Antonio Amador Berumen

United States of America, and v. Antonio Amador Berumen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1970 · Chambers, Ely, Hufstedler, Per Curiam
426 F.2d 310; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8926 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States of America, and v. Antonio Amador Berumen

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We find no error in the court’s ruling on the motion to suppress. The jury instructions given in the trial court were not objected to by defendant’s counsel. We find no plain error in the instructions. Perhaps defendant might have had some supplemental instructions had he requested them, but he did not.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.