U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States

Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 8, 1970 · Wright, Kilkenny, Boldt
427 F.2d 163; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9345 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert I. Waxman (argued), Atty., Dept, of Justice, Johnnie W. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Washington, D. C., Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Jack C. Wong, Asst. U. S. Attorney, Portland, Or., for appellant., William H. Kinsey (argued), of Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey & Williamson, Warde H. Erwin, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Power Brake Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. United States

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, in the exercise of its expertise, followed the over-all judicial philosophy expressed in Campana Corporation v. Harrison, 114 F.2d 400 (7th Cir. 1940) and E. Albrecht & Son, Inc. v. Landy, 114 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1940), for a great many years. On the record before us, we decline to distinguish those cases and thus permit appellant to abandon its own interpretation of the statute as applied to the appellee.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.