U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States of America, and v. Larry James Taylor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 4, 1970 · Chambers, Merrill, Per Curiam, Pregerson

427 F.2d 711; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8900 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gene Phillippo, Tucson, Ariz., for appellant., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Wm. C. Smitherman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Larry James Taylor (9th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant presents issues on appeal which were not presented to the trial court.

The case is remanded to the district court with the suggestion that Taylor be permitted to move for reconsideration of the order revoking probation.

It is possible that the stenographic record of the original sentencing proceeding and any initial written instructions by the probation officer to Taylor may be pertinent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.