U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States v. John Norman Stow

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 27, 1970 · Hamley, Browning, Trask

427 F.2d 891; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9042 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. B. Tietz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., David Fox (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, James E. Shekoyan, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Peter Arthur Fox (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Jon Mardis Pennington (9th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Stanley Albert Kohls (9th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Larry Nolan Dobie (4th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Samuel L. Broyles (9th Cir. 1970)
United States v. Philip Dale Supina (9th Cir. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Norman Stow appeals from his one-count conviction for refusing to submit to induction in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. Appellant was processed as a “delinquent” after he failed to report for his physical examination.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in United States v. Thomas, 422 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970), we reverse.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.