U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

Ruben P. Chavez, and v. Walter Craven, Warden

Ruben P. Chavez, and v. Walter Craven, Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 8, 1970 · Chambers, Trask, Plummer
428 F.2d 185; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8277 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William S. Clark (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Ruben P. Chavez (pro se) Represa, Cal., for appellant., Mark W. Jordan (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Wm. E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Ruben P. Chavez, and v. Walter Craven, Warden

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order denying habeas corpus relief on a state conviction is affirmed.

In our view, before we consider whether counsel was ineffective in not seeking a hearing in the California Supreme Court (such a hearing being discretionary with that court), Chavez should show a federal court that he had a point of real substance which was lost. We cannot find it.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.