U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections

Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 16, 1970 · Chambers, Koelsch, Byrne
428 F.2d 824 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Daniel Boone Hymes, in pro. per., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., John T. Murphy, and Timoth G. Laddish, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decision refusing habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

The district court found that the questions presented had been previously decided and rejected by the same court. Of course, the district court can take judicial notice of its own records, and appellant has not brought forward the records of other petitions.

Also, we have trouble finding a substantial federal question in the petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.