U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

United States v. Philip Dale Supina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 22, 1970 · Merrill, Koelsch, Wilkins

428 F.2d 1226; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8580 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

W. Edward Morgan, (argued) Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant., Joe Jencks, (argued) Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiffappellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Peter Arthur Fox (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Jon Mardis Pennington (9th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Stanley Albert Kohls (9th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Larry Nolan Dobie (4th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction against Philip Dale Supina for refusing to submit to induction (50 U.S.C.App. § 462) is reversed.

The record discloses that this is another one of those cases in which the registrant was processed for induction as a “delinquent” by his Local Board after he failed to report for his physical examination. United States v. Stow, 427 F.2d 891 (9th Cir. filed May 27, 1970); see United States v Broyles, 427 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. filed June 8, 1970); United States v. Thomas, 422 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.