U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

James Heffley v. Carl Hocker, Warden Nevada State Prison

James Heffley v. Carl Hocker, Warden Nevada State Prison
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 13, 1970 · Hamley, Merrill, Per Curiam, Powell
429 F.2d 1321; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8212 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James A. Heffley, James C. Martin, Carson City, Nev., for appellant., Harvey Dickerson, Atty. Gen., of Nevada, Carson City, Nev., for appellee.

James Heffley v. Carl Hocker, Warden Nevada State Prison

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On December 9, 1969, Judge Powell dissenting, we reversed a district court order which had denied relief in this habeas corpus proceeding and remanded the cause to the district court for further proceedings. On June 29, 1970, the United States Supreme Court, sub nom. Hocker v. Heffley, 399 U.S. 521, 90 S.Ct. 2236, 26 L.Ed.2d 780, vacated our judgment and remanded the cause to this court for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419, decided June 22, 1970.

The rationale of Chambers v. Maroney requires us to hold that the search and seizure here in question was valid under the Fourth Amendment, made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. All of Heffley’s points on appeal are predicated upon his contention, which must now be rejected, that such search and seizure was illegal. Accordingly, the order dismissing the habeas proceeding is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.