U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Greentree Electronics Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 12, 1970 · Ely, Hufstedler, Byrne

432 F.2d 1011; 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2656; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6467 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jerome Weinstein (argued), Atty. N. L. R. B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Jr. and Carol Cole Kleinman, Attys., Washington, D. C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N. L. R. B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Willard Z. Carr, Jr. (argued), of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. Inland Motors (9th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petition for enforcement is granted. The Board issued an opinion, reported at 176 N.L.R.B. No. 126 (June 23, 1969).

The respondent argues that the Board’s order is not supported by substantial evidence. On the crucial factual dispute, there is no sharp conflict in the evidence. At the same time, reasonable inferences which may be drawn from that evidence are conflicting. The respondent quite forceably emphasizes the inferences which support its position. The Board, on the other hand, points to opposing inferences. We are not persuaded that the inferences drawn by the Board were unreasonable or without substantial basis in fact.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.