U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

Rudolph Hoskins, and v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden

Rudolph Hoskins, and v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 13, 1970 · Chambers, Jertberg, Hufstedler
432 F.2d 1355; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6428 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Richard R. Day (argued), Rohnert Park, Cal., for appellant., James Cuneo (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., John P. Oakes, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Rudolph Hoskins, and v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the district court is affirmed. See Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 25 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969); Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); and Moss v. Craven, 9th Cir., 427 F.2d 139 (1970).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.