U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

Michael Sidney Lineker v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 4, 1970 · Hamley, Merrill, Koelsch

432 F.2d 1358 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Michael Sidney Lineker, in pro. per., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., JoAnn D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Gil Munzo Leano v. United States (9th Cir. 1972)
Jose Manuel Quijada Gaxiola v. United States (9th Cir. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The denial of the application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Weber, 429 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1970).

On appeal, petitioner also advances several other contentions in an attempt to show that his plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made. None of the contentions were presented to the District Court and we decline to consider them here.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.