U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1970

East Bay Union of Machinists, Local, 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.

East Bay Union of Machinists, Local, 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 10, 1970
435 F.2d 556 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jay A. Darwin (argued), of Darwin & Riordan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants., E. Judge Elderkin (argued), Marion B. Plant, of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

East Bay Union of Machinists, Local, 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. East Bay Union of Machinists, Local 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., 285 F.Supp. 282 (N.D.Cal. 1968).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.