United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison
United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison
435 F.2d 555
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We reject the contention under the Sixth Amendment: Confrontation.
Commendably able counsel cites Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213. On the facts here, in our view it cuts against him. Also, we agree with the trial court that the statement of the absent witness was a verbal act.
On the point as to “why the defendant was arrested,” on which the defendant was not permitted to vindicate himself, we find the court’s ruling was within its sound discretion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.