Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 6, 1971

Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, 435 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus relief was sought in the district court essentially on the grounds of saturated publicity (see Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600) and that the jury was thereby prejudiced. Relief was denied and we affirm.

Appellant simply does not bring himself within Sheppard and other related decisions where relief was granted.

It appears that appellant is indulging in successive petitions. It may soon be time to apply 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles J. CARTER, Appellant, v. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellee
Status: Published