Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III, 436 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971)
Chambers, Merrill, Conti

United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George HASLAM, III, Appellant
Status
Published
↑