Appellant, Raquel Grijalva, appeals from her conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 111 (assaulting a federal officer) .

The only point on appeal that requires comment is her contention that evidence admitted against her, over objection, was the product of an illegal search and seizure. Despite the able and ingenious arguments of counsel, we think the search in this case fell within the bounds of Warden v. Hayden (1967) 387 U.S. 294, 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782 and thus did not run athwart her Fourth Amendment rights.

The judgment is affirmed.