United States v. James Alford Chatman
Opinion
The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1
This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
1
. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Alford CHATMAN, Appellant
- Status
- Published