United States v. James Alford Chatman
United States v. James Alford Chatman
436 F.2d 1377
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. James Alford Chatman
Opinion
The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1
This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
1
. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.