United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 10, 1971

United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey, 436 F.2d 1385 (9th Cir. 1971)

1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11928

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this bank robbery case.

A Miranda point is made (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694). The facts here fall within our United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

We find the assertion of inadequate representation to be without substance. It appears to have been quite competent, and the objections now are those of second guessing.

The length of the sentence is attacked and it is asserted there was obvious prejudice of the court. We cannot accept the validity of the assertion and we cannot review sentence.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Harold Wayne LINDSEY, Appellant
Status: Published