United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau
United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau
442 F.2d 362; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10259
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau
Opinion
Appellant’s contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.