U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1971

United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 11, 1971 · Merrill, Ely, Jameson

442 F.2d 362; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10259 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John E. Thorne, of Thorne, Stanton, Clopton, Herz & Stanek, San Jose, Cal., for appellant., James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Chief, Crim. Div., James L. Hazard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.