George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale, 443 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1971)
15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889
Hamley, Koelsch, Per Curiam, Trask

George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 1

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.

Reference

Full Case Name
George Sing LOUIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CARNEVALE Et Al., DefendantsAppellees
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published