U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1971

B-E-C-K McLaughlin & Associates, and v. The Renegotiation Board

B-E-C-K McLaughlin & Associates, and v. The Renegotiation Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 7, 1971 · No. 24661 · Chambers, Koelsch, Der Heydt
443 F.2d 1180; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9116 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James H. Prentice (argued), Special Litigation Atty., L. Patrick Gray, III, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Simon Wampold (argued), Josef Diamond, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

B-E-C-K McLaughlin & Associates, and v. The Renegotiation Board

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We are unable to find either errors of law by the Tax Court or that the findings of fact are arbitrary or capricious.

The case is affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, TC Memo 1969-15; see 1169,015 P-H Memo TC.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.