Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.
Opinion
The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
First, we find that Sjosten has never presented or attempted to present the point to a California state court which he makes in federal court.
Further, on the facts here, the error does not rise to constitutional dimensions. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert W. SJOSTEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Merle SCHECKLOTH, Etc., Appellee
- Status
- Published