The summary judgment rendered against plaintiff-appellant is reversed. We think this is indicated by In re Ruf-falo (1968), 390 U.S. 544, 88 S.Ct. 1222, 20 L.Ed.2d 117, and Theard v. United States (1957), 354 U.S. 278, 77 S.Ct. 1274, 1 L.Ed.2d 1342. We believe Bogart has a constitutional right to a hearing before the agency before being denied the right to further practice before the agency, department regulations to the contrary notwithstanding.