Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California, 449 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1971)
Ely, Kilkenny, McNICHOLS, Per Curiam

Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel Mark SIEGEL and Associated Students of University of California (A.S.U.C.), Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Et Al., Appellees
Status
Published