U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1971

United States v. Hull

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 10, 1971

441 F.2d 1165 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

George W. Hunt (appeared), of Humphreys & Hunt, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Hull., Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant Munds., Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon (9th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed. We find no error.

United States v. Markham, 9 Cir., 440 F.2d 1119, decided April 12, 1971, answers the principal contention made here.

The mandate will issue now.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.