U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1971

Castro v. Fullilove

Castro v. Fullilove
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 9, 1971
442 F.2d 1341 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

M. Ronald Gould, of Dalton, Bautista & Bautista, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, Atty., of I. N. S., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Castro v. Fullilove

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

*1342The district director in denying Castro’s application did not abuse his discretion. See Reyes v. Carter, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 734, decided April 14, 1970.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.